From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-05 09:18:03 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!skynet.be!193.162.153.122.MISMATCH!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and Database Date: 05 Jan 2001 18:22:29 +0100 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87ofxlc3sa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3692 Date: 2001-01-05T18:22:29+01:00 List-Id: Mario Amado Alves writes: > > [ADaLIB] > > > > The license isn't compatible with the Debian Free Software Guidelines > > either. > > URL? http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines > > The notification requirement is particularly obnoxious. > The idea here is to collect usage metrics to help quantify the Ad�lib > software process: I could not think of any other way to do this. > Suggestions? Hmm. Don't try to make it a formal requirement, make it suggestion. The restriction to 'good software' is questionable, too...