From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5867ff5404195f0e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 06:05:53 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:46:25 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87ofnnvahq.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <tgu1xikvmn.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <3BBA9724.2020009@earthlink.net>
 <5ee5b646.0110030812.d2ad098@posting.google.com>
 <slrn9rn5tj.uu.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <5ee5b646.0110040338.4ebe6529@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13715
Date: 2001-10-04T14:46:25+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> I just don't want people to get the wrong impression here.
> I think a fair analogy is the extent to which chill got
> picked up as part of typical gcc installs.

With the same prospect for the future?  I hope not. ;-)