From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,56525db28240414a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.72.73 with SMTP id b9mr1591020pav.9.1343044041179;
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.82.2 with SMTP id e2mr1249020pay.40.1343044041106;
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p10ni38725503pbh.1!nntp.google.com!u4no2152886pbs.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni38942545pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!news.nctu.edu.tw!csnews.cs.nctu.edu.tw!news.cs.nctu.edu.tw!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficient Sequential Access to Arrays
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:16:26 +0200
Message-ID: <87obne5k3p.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <01983f1c-f842-4b1f-a180-bcef531dad4c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1342548985 8691 172.17.135.6 (17 Jul 2012 18:16:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NzewLGfNUfI4AEpGjLQAxJqWWBM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-17T20:16:26+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Keean Schupke:

> So assuming we need this level of performance, what would be the
> best (and most idiomatic Ada) way to package this type of usage
> pattern as an abstract datatype?

You should look at compiler dumps to figure out why tge strength
reduction optimization does not kick in.