From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,577ecbb6c5a53a1f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.112.39.168 with SMTP id q8mr10162lbk.13.1349942813335;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q10ni65082491wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!216.40.29.245.MISMATCH!novia!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Forking old GMGPL libs ?
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:10:10 +0200
Message-ID: <87obkg5b59.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <5de9a47c-6594-4653-a083-38f90312e70e@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1349507409 4126 172.17.135.6 (6 Oct 2012 07:10:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WKuIVkYe7eb2skykeJn6W1i4O+0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-10-06T09:10:10+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> This is total crack smok'in, I hardly know anything about the clang
> compiler and don't have the time of intelligence to fork GNAT but
> does anyone think it would be technically possible to retool GNAT's
> to output clang's AST.

Clang's AST is very specific to the C family of languages.  You'd have
to generate LLVM directly.