From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMSPACE,
	FROM_ADDR_WS,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfb98535bcaeb3a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: " "@deneb.cygnus.argh.org (Florian Weimer)
Subject: Re: Controlled types in local generics?
Date: 1999/12/30
Message-ID: <87n1qsvi5a.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 566459261
References: <386AFDA8.7C3110CC@telepath.com>
Mail-Copies-To: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org
X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 946549601 10351 192.168.1.2 (30 Dec 1999
 10:26:41 GMT)
Organization: Penguin on board
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Dec 1999 10:26:41 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-30T10:26:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:

> Surely this isn't saying that all controlled types must be declared at
> the library level? 

What about 3.9.1(67)?