From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,27e56580ae0c3b7d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-26 03:17:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!beeblebrox!nobody From: Samuel Tardieu Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for Debian Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:12:52 +0200 Organization: Avian Carrier & Friends Message-ID: <87n0f1mw9n.fsf@inf.enst.fr> References: <404ee0af.0307211056.15324da@posting.google.com> <20030722021229.15da08ae.david@realityrift.com> <20030722135518.32888aaa.david@realityrift.com> <20030722165245.15f880a2.david@realityrift.com> <20030723125549.1336a07f.david@realityrift.com> <20030723134949.7badd43c.david@realityrift.com> <3f1f9c07.90089321@news.greenlnk.net> <3f1fc2d7.100025238@news.greenlnk.net> <3f1ffea7.115337085@news.greenlnk.net> <87u19apywl.fsf@inf.enst.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: willow.rfc1149.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1059214630 45081 213.41.154.244 (26 Jul 2003 10:17:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 10:17:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.5 (cauliflower, i386--freebsd) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aZyy3q+eK1UBNTLY/aV2g+JEHhY= X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40827 Date: 2003-07-26T12:12:52+02:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Ludovic" == Ludovic Brenta writes: Ludovic> Thanks for the info. I've been thinking some more about Ludovic> this. Is it really desirable to provide a shared library Ludovic> with debugging support? The reason I'm wondering is Debian Ludovic> bug #58329: gnat library compiled with bad path to sources. The advantage was clearly not to have to relink your application between development and production: you could test your application with the "gnat" package installed, and distribute it as-is. Your application was dynamically linked, and the receiver could run it with the sole libgnat-... package installed. But this is not mandatory at all. Ludovic> I don't know if this problem also applies to the static Ludovic> library. Yup, it did. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam