From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b3ebf057333800c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder5.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: virtual memory,
 was Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
References: <4726d889$1@news.post.ch>
	<8P-dnbw2Ydw2y7ranZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@comcast.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:35:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87myu0cpd9.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:o5yi5vscgAYRM4xrOuQcxpWWQC0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Tele2
X-Trace: 
 DXC=RUC;^`[DbiYo_LXIbUAeEX6`Y6aWje^YZmX]7R<JlQC\@WAS81_gI6V>`3AhJZ0:LXdOJL[Kh`S:\
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2656
Date: 2007-10-30T21:35:30+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tmoran@acm.org writes:
>>How much virtual memory does your computer have?
>   I wonder how many programmers today have any experience with the
> judicious use of virtual memory.  PC users almost always buy enough
> physical memory to satisfy all their apps, and with 32 bit machines
> that was cheap and easy.
>   There will probably also be a learning curve as todays' programmers
> find out what "judicious use" means w.r.t. multiple CPUs.

My laptop has two cores and two gigs of memory.  I routinely build GCC
4.2 in a 1280-MiB tmpfs in memory.  This is large enough for all
temporary files; at the end of the build, just under 990 MiB are still
in use.  The build uses 3 threads (i.e. one more than the number of
cores) and the system uses approximately 400 Mb of physical swap, but
that's because I keep X, emacs and galeon running all the time :) No
thrashing takes place and the system is very responsive even during a
build.

In my experience, building in a tmpfs is approximately 3 times as fast
as on a regulsr (XFS) filesystem, even though the kernel has lots of
physical memory to use as a disk cache.

I suggested this solution to Xavier Grave, who builds GCC 4.2 on a
dual-core, dual-thread POWER5 machine with 8 GiB of physical RAM.  He
also reported a three-fold improvement (roughly) even though each of
the cores has a 36 MiB level 3 cache that can probably hold all of
GCC :)

Note that we didn't even bother to measure the improvement precisely,
so it is very unscientific.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.