From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp12-2.free.fr!not-for-mail From: Samuel Tardieu Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT GPL 2009? References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <87r5zeru4p.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87mya2rtwe.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:05lwQ58SD+7p3sC3KN8/6fGIpEg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:6f8:37a:2::2 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Apr 2009 17:40:01 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.121.19.179 X-Trace: 1240846801 news-1.free.fr 6541 91.121.19.179:33918 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5558 Date: 2009-04-27T17:40:01+02:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu writes: Sam> Or to the FSF, on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla if you also use the Sam> pristine GNAT from GCC. Also note that the your example compiles fine using either GCC 4.3.3 or later using with package S is new Signature (<>); Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/