From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Carroll Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:20:16 +0000 Organization: none Message-ID: <87mvrghlwv.fsf@ixod.org> References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56af17b7$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <56b06eb8$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1454483747.2785.135.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1b3e5cba9e4d07a53741e6f3d1717925"; logging-data="10104"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HZ1UMBbui0eNqLsmMIjNP" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bTHAP6a/6PiRVgROCCp7QNJWmE4= sha1:dwMPahR2+eN5Zgr7Q+aoUXAR06k= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29338 Date: 2016-02-04T09:20:16+00:00 List-Id: On 04 Feb 2016, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 03/02/2016 23:11, Randy Brukardt wrote: (snip) >> All my GUI work to date has been on Windows, for which (as I'm sure you >> know) we constructed Claw -- which depends on nothing other than the stuff >> Microsoft includes in the OS (and an Ada compiler). If I wanted to make a >> portable GUI today, I'd use HTML directly for simple systems and most likely >> something like GNOGA for more complex ones. If you're going to compromise >> with a "portable" GUI, might was well use something that really does work >> anywhere (and you get remote access for free). > > Well, I don't think browser-based GUI will ever replace native GUI. Quite probably, but I do expect things like http://electron.atom.io/ to see increasing use, especially by those maintain both web and desktop interfaces to their systems; it's kind of the opposite of Google Web Toolkit's approach. Such tools seem to become increasingly available and usable. -- Mark