From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8bc57ad5ed1a513e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Elaboration circularity
Date: 2000/02/07
Message-ID: <87mds4$eih$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 582609158
References: <949502026.152029@edh3> <389858D0.32A39FFC@earthlink.net>
 <87i2en$hfa$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <949922875.616391@edh3>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x25.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 07 12:29:58 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-02-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <949922875.616391@edh3>,
  Frode Tenneboe <ft@alne.edh.ericsson.se> wrote:
> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> Please elaborate (!) or are you referring to the static
> pragma elaborate*?

No, I am not referring to pragma Elaborate, but rather to the
static elaboration analysis performed by GNAT in default mode.
See the chapter in the GNAT user's guide for details. We find
that quite a bit of our support effort for customers moving
large legacy code involves help with cleaning up elaboration
problems.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.