From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd9cc025dfe30cf6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chris Morgan Subject: gnat docs Date: 1998/12/16 Message-ID: <87lnk8owt0.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 422924777 Sender: cm@mihalis.ix.netcom.com Organization: Linux Hackers Unlimited X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Dec 16 8:48:18 AM PST 1998 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-16T08:48:18-08:00 List-Id: Since GNAT 3.11p is "due" out any minute, I went and took a look at my GNAT documents. It turns out I've been getting by with drafts of the documents from GNAT 3.07 dated November 1996, so when the 3.11 release finally hits the net I'd like to get the latest documentation printed off. I was just thinking that presumably a lot of other GNAT users will do the same, and I have a question : could we get a nicely printed and bound batch of these done (maybe by the FSF?). I'd pay typical FSF prices for each which I understand produces a modest profit for them. I like to sit on my couch and read sharply printed text, so html, info and .txt files aren't sufficient! The public release of GNAT is now on a similar or slower timescale to things like Java or Perl which O'Reilly manages to keep tabs on with commercial titles, but I do realise the GNAT user community is somewhat smaller, hence my idea that a FSF-type print-run may be justifiable. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Morgan http://www.mihalis.net "At least my mother isn't on the cover of Crack Whore magazine"