From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d171ebc7489c6b9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:47:03 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Licensing, again References: Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:44:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87lkr7et01.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:O+MX6skkDUq07EtRza52QMpdqY4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.237.82 X-Trace: sv3-bsvwdy1gaTkV/YnqbCivcu8Nff2M1JO8u0JYr+CkfdV7p3TQPHBsJhgd7sMz2sPyA1LLwVruaFx0bmq!LR4mdMDFwqG/IDBT60zBCfeeseafSiRz+V3rHXbM8sNkcAr0uN1r7uUMnOW+6xqxLOTW6m4iaQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5515 Date: 2006-07-05T21:44:46+02:00 List-Id: Carroll, Andrew writes: > After all, YOU would expect me to read the explanation in c.l.a. but I > do not revolve around what YOU want. Not to mention that the wiki-link > was not presented as a FAQ link before I asked the question nor was it > presented as an FAQ in the response to my question. For that matter > Ludovic wasn't even the person to say that the wiki IS the FAQ. The reason why it is a FAQ is because we've been discussing this licensing issue to death for a couple of weeks now. Nobody here can be held responsible if you missed these threads entirely. I saw a post from you two weeks ago, where you said you were having a hard time catching up. Fine: I was nice enough not to blame you for missing the recent discussion, and instead I pointed you to full, documented answers. If now you refuse to read them, "this is your problem, man". Just like Markus said. I feel you owe us both an apology. -- Ludovic Brenta.