From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13908470ad286d21
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: allowable protected-object subprogram-calls
Date: 2000/02/07
Message-ID: <87lhit$r8c$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 582500935
References: <87l9ea$q4e$1@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x25.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 07 04:27:13 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-02-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <87l9ea$q4e$1@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>,
  "Peter A. Buhr" <pabuhr@plg2.math.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> I am trying to determine the rules for which calls are allowed
> among protected subprograms in a protected object.

A substantial part of your confusion is that you have not
registered that an entry is NOT a subprogram! At least that's
my guess from what you wrote.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.