From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.109.59.35.6.mobile.3.dk!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to use Zero Footprint runtime with GNAT GPL 2017 Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:39:49 +0200 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: <87lgno7b6i.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> References: <4615326c-a35f-4baa-9a1e-2b13e69fb642@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="109.59.35.6.mobile.3.dk:109.59.35.6"; logging-data="11053"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0+M331Knv6XwIEDbTNEaFiiIvnE= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47429 Date: 2017-07-16T15:39:49+02:00 List-Id: Lucretia wrote: > ZFP means all you have are the compiler intrinsics as language support > and nothing else. Although, I modified mine to include a small > secondary stack so that indefinites could be returned from functions. How much larger does that make the run-time? (Compiled for ARM, for example.) Greetings, Jacob -- recursive, adj.; see recursive