From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,78a1af350f4cf4b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
Subject: Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects'
Date: 2000/02/15
Message-ID: <87k8k69qm9.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 586259841
References: <38A989B7.2D4D6B56@maths.unine.ch>
Mail-Copies-To: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org
X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 950645246 12303 192.168.1.2 (15 Feb 2000
 20:07:26 GMT)
Organization: Penguin on board
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Florian Weimer <fw-usenet@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Feb 2000 20:07:26 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-02-15T20:07:26+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch> writes:

> Urging developers to clean up their code, a Microsoft exec
> says: 'How many of you would spend $500 on a piece of
> software with over 63,000 potential known defects?' It
> ships Thursday.

63,000 `potential known defects' (whatever this means) isn't too bad for
a software product consisting of over 30 million lines of code, is it?