From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d9eb594a33cb947
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-31 14:21:14 PST
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: very specific question on Ada syntax
Date: 31 Jan 2001 23:09:08 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87k87bs7az.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <mailman.980940984.1270.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!212.7.128.161!renate.komtel.net!blackbush.xlink.net!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.uni-ulm.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4789
Date: 2001-01-31T23:09:08+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mario Amado Alves <maa@di.fct.unl.pt> writes:

> According to Dewar and Taft (this thread) I should add String_Literal (Taft
> only) and Character_Literal to the list of apostrophe-enabling previous
> tokens (lines 64-66). But those are syntax errors, no?

A character literal is a prefix, taking attributes is allowed.  In
contrast, a string literal is not a prefix, see RM 4.1(2) and 4.1.4.