From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,495738d3723c3c78 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and constraint programming Supersedes: <87mzxped8i.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:06:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87k6sted7l.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <419231fa$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1100113567 16973 212.9.189.171 (10 Nov 2004 19:06:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Key: sha1:MqWOU2s1Tj5lzPzjP9Gq+YuFl/0= Cancel-Lock: sha1:dTwWd/TAVwGXdRiNRMaCYHBGbPQ= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6127 Date: 2004-11-10T20:06:06+01:00 List-Id: * Jean-Pierre Rosen: > No. It's more about finding a solution that minimizes > this while not exceeding that, with an upper bound of foo that must > not be more than half of bar... This is called "linear programming", I think, at least in some special cases.