From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c71bf3c5adc59b21
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Opening a file vs. creating if not yet exists
Date: 19 Aug 2008 16:23:49 +0200
Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server
Sender: sparre@jspa-nykredit
Message-ID: <87k5edjd6y.fsf@nbi.dk>
References: <af68d80f-0f42-4524-a963-80c91b427ad9@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.27.19.149.bredband.3.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1219155830 24135 212.27.19.149 (19 Aug 2008 14:23:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7378
Date: 2008-08-19T16:23:49+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> I find this a bit annoying for example with log files, where the
> natural scheme should be:
> - if the file exists, open and append to it
> - if the file does not exist, create it and append to it
> 
> What is the recommended way to deal with this?
> 
> begin
>    Open (File, Append_File, "file.txt");
> exception
>    when Name_Error =>
>       Create (File, Append_File, "file.txt");
> end;
> 
> Is the above idiomatic (ie. well understood and accepted as common
> practice)?

I am certain it is well understood and commonly used, but in general
it is not advised to use exceptions in ordinary control flow.  Amado's
suggestion using Ada.Directories.File_Exists is definitely closer to
the advised practice.

The problem with both of these solutions is that they are not atomic.
POSIX.IO.Open_Or_Create is more appropriate (if you are targeting a
standards compliant operating system), since it solves the problem as
an atomic operation.

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
"Any, sufficiently advanced, technology is indistinguishable from magic."