From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9bdec20bcc7f3687 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,gid8d3408f8c3,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.bawue.net!news.buerger.net!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:34:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87k4s9lnw4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1271280847 6357 212.9.189.177 (14 Apr 2010 21:34:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de Cancel-Lock: sha1:7GdV7ApyyxeYN0sdWgZ2iCEtdSc= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9986 comp.lang.fortran:22414 Date: 2010-04-14T23:34:03+02:00 List-Id: * Keith Thompson: > Unfortunately, the C99 standard has not yet been universally adopted. > Very few compilers fully support it. Many support most of it, > but I understand that Microsoft's compiler still supports only C90 > (with maybe a handful of C99-specific features). SPEC2006 contains a benchmark which needs C99 complex values (or some variant of that), so you better support that, or you can't get a score.