From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in my code or the compiler?
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:02:37 +0200
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <87k2v6oe6q.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
References: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com>
	<mlirbb$ni2$1@loke.gir.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.59.57.178.mobile.3.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1434272558 30003 109.59.57.178 (14 Jun 2015 09:02:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EhhnPhBiFUIcO7JiZWO61tKs8I0=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26318
Date: 2015-06-14T11:02:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Randy Brukardt wrote:

> I would have expected this second expression to be illegal, because it
> seems to violate 6.4.1(6.18-19/3). That rule was introduced in Ada
> 2012 along with "in out" function parameters to avoid "obvious"
> dependence on order of evaluation.

Is there an ACATS test for that rule?  (If not, then I'll volunteer to
formulate and submit one.)

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
"It is very easy to get ridiculously confused about the
 tenses of time travel, but most things can be resolved
 by a sufficiently large ego."