From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c9f1733206a18a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-09 06:49:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!uni-erlangen.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interest in sockets package development Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 15:41:35 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87ites7a7k.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9neodq$1vcs$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12946 Date: 2001-09-09T15:41:35+02:00 List-Id: "David Botton" writes: >> I am currently developing a LGPL'ed thick binding for sockets in my spare >> time. The purpose of this binding is to provide better control of sockets >> in a multi-tasking environment. > > Is It not possible to use GNAT.Sockets to do this already? Has ACT made a public release yet?