From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,62a76f7157243e61
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
References: <1193782578.950217.150590@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<878x5kcgeo.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <uwst31ptw.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:02:21 +0100
Message-ID: <87ir4nv6eq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z3GghcX3Hj6mTZmILPKIX8d59DQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Tele2
X-Trace: 
 DXC=73BAO4T35=O_X<i\<KdXUO6`Y6aWje^YJ1ik_Qf^XdGH@WAS81_gI6F2?M_5_ZW07BhSO2JXb\JPB
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2674
Date: 2007-10-31T13:02:21+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> writes:
>> Officially informally (!), it is "Ada 2005" because ARM 3.1/2 says so.
>> That is the result of a majority agreement between the members of the
>> working group, most of whom are compiler vendors.
>
> Just being pedantic, I don't see that statement in ARM 3.1/2; that
> paragraph doesn't exist; see
> http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-3-1.html 
>
> Perhaps you meant a different paragraph?

Yes, I meant paragraph 3.1/2 in the Introduction, not paragraph 2 in
section 3.1.  See http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-0-3.html

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.