From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,982baa899e4e2a9f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.238.65 with SMTP id vi1mr10204003pbc.7.1340546025453;
        Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni14622pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++11 and Ada 2012 - renaissance of native languages?
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:53:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87ipegrf2v.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <7290d163-cee1-4ccc-b637-bb8324d927a4@googlegroups.com>
	<2201dc1b-ce74-43a9-a183-a419aba2f678@googlegroups.com>
	<js5pej$nlc$1@adenine.netfront.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1340546024 1299 172.17.135.6 (24 Jun 2012 13:53:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WpC78dh/QAl9FeuwP/6L4YwJ+ZE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-06-24T15:53:44+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Jeffrey Carter:

> On 06/23/2012 03:25 PM, gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> So it is an opportunity for highly portable, multi-platform
>> solutions, where some of the safety is even available without
>> run-time checks. Now the list of those solutions is..... :-) ?
>
> Don't forget hihg-level, safe, concurrency features in the language to
> to be able to quickly and easily take advantage of the common
> multi-core processors. That helps narrow it down even further.

And Ada 2012 still lacks basic building blocks for lock-free and
wait-free algorithms, so the field is pretty narrow indeed. 8-)