From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,56525db28240414a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.75.8 with SMTP id y8mr1465283wiv.4.1343334527415;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.180.205 with SMTP id bv13mr1373020qab.8.1343314535456;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.76.130 with SMTP id k2mr1791239paw.16.1343314535277;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q11ni79658029wiw.1!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-C.news.volia.net!y14no4623129qaj.0!news-out.google.com!a15ni113198934qag.0!nntp.google.com!q21no2560369qas.0!news-out.google.com!p10ni64906263pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!multikabel.net!newsfeed10.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.swapon.de!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficient Sequential Access to Arrays
Supersedes: <87obne5k3p.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:21:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87ipdf4vh6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <01983f1c-f842-4b1f-a180-bcef531dad4c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1342974116 20819 172.17.135.6 (22 Jul 2012 16:21:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Key: sha1:RpRirnmRNqMm5OD2ecTLeES1I1g=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:isCmPjZHmEc7ODZi5T2VxN82kAQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-22T18:21:57+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Keean Schupke:

> So assuming we need this level of performance, what would be the
> best (and most idiomatic Ada) way to package this type of usage
> pattern as an abstract datatype?

You should look at compiler dumps to figure out why the strength
reduction optimization does not kick in.