From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e91a32061bde112 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: JAVA and ADA JGNAT Date: 2000/02/05 Message-ID: <87i8q9$lni$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 582041405 References: <862sv5$sug$1@pirates.Armstrong.EDU> <862t3o$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <86k8r6$alp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <86kpbu$aik1@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x35.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Feb 05 22:39:05 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-02-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol wrote: > As for compilers I think this is even more crucial. I would rather > have a JGNAT that works well than an alpha product that makes the > programs crash a lot and thus gets a bad reputation. But it might be > that I for general OS products expect them to be alpha or beta and > crash a lot, I don't expect compilers to do the same. :-) By the way, returning to the subject implied by the line marked SUBJECT above :-) we do have some good news, the initial beta testing of JGNAT has been going well, and we need relatively few tweaks before we have a distributable version, so it should not be too long now before you can kick the tires. (and I must say that I am NOT hoping that someone will say "great, this doesn't work at all, ACT has finally seen the light and is not waiting till software works before it is distributed for us to mess with." :-) Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.