From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd3a5ba6349a6060 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: Semantic info pragmas (was: should I be interested in ada?) Date: 1999/03/01 Message-ID: <87hfs5juyx.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 449952193 References: <7a72e6$g55$1@probity.mcc.ac.uk> <36C93BB4.1429@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <7afc1o$3mi$2@plug.news.pipex.net> <7afttr$7v3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7aganu$qsc$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <36CC3AEA.59E2@lanl.gov> <7ai502$6an$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36CD8DBA.237C@lanl.gov> <7b2545$4qd$2@plug.news.pipex.net> <7b8cv9$ii5$1@plug.news.pipex.net> Mail-Copies-To: sam@ada.eu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.enst.fr X-Trace: enst.enst.fr 920296178 28388 137.194.160.95 (1 Mar 1999 13:49:38 GMT) Organization: TELECOM Paris User-Agent: Gnus/5.070077 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.77) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 1999 13:49:38 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-01T13:49:38+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts writes: Nick> RM95 2.8(16) states "Normally, implementation-defined pragmas Nick> should have no semantic effect for error-free programs; ...," so Nick> I should have said 'shouldn't' rather than 'can't'. I think Nick> this is an area where there would be no good excuse for Nick> introducing implementation-defined pragmas which did change the Nick> semantics. "Normally" means "except where specified", right? Because pragma Asynchronous certainly does change the semantics of a procedure call in regard with exceptions. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org