From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,30a7e825312b39d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Software Engineering Ethics Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:17:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87hdls8bsu.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1105179457 24162 212.9.189.171 (8 Jan 2005 10:17:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:JSuqxveiCr9kByLQ6fbfFfW1A8U= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7562 Date: 2005-01-08T11:17:37+01:00 List-Id: * Nick Roberts: > I'm pretty sure the most effective way to evangelise the world about > the advantages of Ada (and about the problems with C++ and its > siblings) is to demonstrate to software businesses -- and their > customers -- that using Ada is cheaper (in the long term) and helps > make the product better. This assumes that the market wants better products and is interested in long-term effects of investments. I don't think such assumptions are reasonable.