From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0e1d3b3f7c994b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!inka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Robert Dewar's great article about the Strengths of Ada over Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:12:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87hceyqx86.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <13t4b2kkjem20f3@corp.supernews.com> <89af8399-94fb-42b3-909d-edf3c98d32e5@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <53e0fda7-a536-4899-a115-9d4e137ac698@13g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1206220361 26124 212.9.189.177 (22 Mar 2008 21:12:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:d/G1JSGte2OYobjGUUcsjh+X76c= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20550 Date: 2008-03-22T22:12:41+01:00 List-Id: * Maciej Sobczak: > He claimed that I did not write any multithreading C or C++ program, > presumably because the C and C++ standards say nothing about threads. > For me this kind of argument is just a handwaving and to show this I > replied with the same logic that nobody did here> in Ada, for the simple reason that AARM says nothing about it. Concurrency is a bit different. It cannot be implemented as a library: