From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,75d2eb9e2e52a8c5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem where a function is invoked once but called twice (when
 invocation is within an allocator).
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:40:33 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87hb8y5wj2.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
References: 
 <b0b66310-3c0a-4d48-a3bc-2293931e60a6@s41g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
	<iptdde$hpm$1@dont-email.me> <op.vuz1j0pjule2fv@douda-yannick>
	<fa0604a1-4830-4393-8432-c5cc097695ff@s16g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<87r58dxeia.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<dcd4d840-479f-4bb0-8eb4-3d62acd91474@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
	<e0b21dad-a483-4b1e-a43b-25a47f165840@j23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<17caa8eb-8113-4199-83b7-9b199887a758@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
	<e35c30a9-580a-4607-8bd2-ae21a92dd2e9@h9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<68228b55-070c-4678-b584-8278988e73fc@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
	<85890ff0-343f-4d79-aba0-c3d214b4a28e@t19g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
	<6f9bcec9-219d-4163-96f0-ddc4599f4274@d26g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
	<7333adc4-3b87-48cb-902a-bff11d062b6a@v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<ceb107c2-888b-4ab9-96bb-45ce5c6856d0@z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="inXY666XfPPRNXiXbXpXqA";
	logging-data="11365"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18aV0gIr4utLkA3FA+kLItD"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OS05L1TwBnanNxJgmXS7o07Qqeo=
	sha1:ZL5Cef4amZ3l8W7Fmgj8qEq9phA=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20224
Date: 2011-05-13T19:40:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Rod Kay writes on comp.lang.ada:
> On May 10, 10:55 am, Anh Vo wrote:
>> Have you sent a bug report yet? I hope you did if you want to see it
>> fix in GNAT-GPL-2011.
>
>    One has been sent now (thank you Jesse Lang).
>
>    And thanks to all who've replied and to Dan for taking the time to
> simplify the test case.

I would like this bug report to be public in the GCC bugzilla database;
for multiple reasons, this is better than for the bug to remain private
in AdaCore's bug tracking system.  Could someone take the time to file
it properly in Bugzilla?

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.