From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f24dc79a7753231e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-20 13:52:39 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!teaser.fr!nerim.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!grolier!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.easynews.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: what a tease!
Date: 20 Mar 2001 22:57:19 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87g0g8qf28.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <dale-63DE03.20325420032001@m2.bigpond.net.au>
 <871yrsy7gk.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <qiLt6.472$dS2.2068609@nnrp2.proxad.net>
 <86ofuwjlft.fsf@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5930
Date: 2001-03-20T22:57:19+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org> writes:

> I think it was decided that the commit will be done on the CVS trunk,
> so GCC 3.0 should not have Ada, but GCC 3.1 will.

Yes, anything else would probably affect the GCC 3.0 release plan in a
negative way.  I don't think they are prepared to merge in a frontend
at this stage of development.