From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b3d7c27160f8353
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-02 04:54:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Package name duplication in Hierachical Libraries
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 13:52:36 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87g05o3off.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <3c32e619$1@pull.gecm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7P5ODjZjp7yeRuHCNU0UC91jZnY=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18442
Date: 2002-01-02T13:52:36+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Stuart Forster" <stuart.forster@baesystems.com> writes:

> I have a problem with duplicated package names in hierarchical libraries.
>
> The example below results in an infinite recursion of B.A.C where I was
> hoping for
>
>>Test
> B.A.C
> A.C
>>
>
> Is this the correct behaviour?

Yes, I think so.  You can use Standard.A.C to refer to the other
package.