From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:36:20 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87fu2kmpyj.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <7ba47ec1-28e7-43e1-83a0-2a4d2cf0fd92@googlegroups.com>
	<87vabgn7rk.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<8d534f74-efa1-42ab-aa8a-2826b4cd6cc9@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: h2725194.stratoserver.net;
 posting-host="dd5d94a6802641837a7e1095d0ad209e";
	logging-data="3828"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PPE5u83oJDXeSCeFrkDi+"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6vBNSqPzj8/IBU4DaMJ9KfdaoDU=
	sha1:O/Cufq6ndIlwXh/yYx18G96M3b8=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52564
Date: 2018-05-21T18:36:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com> writes:
> Just wanted to point this out because I think you have a typo, but 
> overflow for unsigned integers is completely defined in the C standard.

Sorry yes of course you're right, it was a typo, I meant to say signed.