From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,332634d2cbb2798c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 14:19:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: svaa@ciberpiula.net (svaa) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: who is in charge of Ada 0Y? Date: 25 Sep 2003 14:19:02 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.82.71.132 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1064524743 12911 127.0.0.1 (25 Sep 2003 21:19:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Sep 2003 21:19:03 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42937 Date: 2003-09-25T21:19:03+00:00 List-Id: I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y. What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But, is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard? As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed. Have I missed something? is there such organization?