From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,571930b4ff0bc1ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-27 10:08:19 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!skynet.be!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Compile time executed functions Date: 27 Mar 2001 20:14:45 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87elvjqdt6.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <3AC03CCE.70E3C2D5@mida.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6130 Date: 2001-03-27T20:14:45+02:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > If you are talking about being able to run pretty much *any* code at > compile time, no that can't be done with just a "trick". I don't > know of any language in existance (but I suppose there probably is > one somewhere) that will let you do that. FORTH and Common Lisp (at least implementations which support compilation) can do this.