From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-31 01:45:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-kar1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to make Ada a dominant language Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:51:52 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87elqxxyzb.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9k36ae$138k$1@pa.aaanet.ru> <3B654276.4040707@bigfoot.de> <3B655CE8.F8FAD2CF@sneakemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10846 Date: 2001-07-31T10:51:52+02:00 List-Id: Russ Paielli <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> writes: >> Like it is in FORTRAN 77? No, it is not convenient only annoying and a >> bug trap. Please explain why it is convenient. > > It is more than "convenient." It FORCES the programmer to use proper > indentation structure, and it assures the reader that the indentation > structure is indeed consistent with the logical structure. It is > completely in the Ada spirit of encouraging good structure and form. It > will ELIMINATE an entire class of bugs. That's why at least one Ada compiler optionally checks indentation and refuses to compile code with confusing and inconsistent indentation.