From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0bf571933019d30 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!transit.news.xs4all.nl!195.241.76.212.MISMATCH!tiscali!transit1.news.tiscali.nl!dreader2.news.tiscali.nl!not-for-mail Sender: lbrenta@deuteronomy Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Named Pipes References: From: Ludovic Brenta Date: 05 May 2004 23:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ekpyk220.fsf@insalien.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Tiscali bv NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 May 2004 23:14:34 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.134.239.240 X-Trace: 1083791674 dreader2.news.tiscali.nl 41755 83.134.239.240:39970 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tiscali.nl Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:292 Date: 2004-05-05T23:14:34+02:00 List-Id: Mark Lorenzen writes: > Named pipes is a POSIX invention. You should therefore use the > ISO/IEC 14519 Ada interface to POSIX-like operating systems. The > GNAT implementation is called 'florist'. I don't know who invented them, but I am prety sure OS/2 and Windows both have named pipes and they do not use anything resembling a POSIX interface. For example, on OS/2: http://www.edm2.com/os2api/Dos/DosConnectNPipe.html I don't think there is a portable interface to named pipes, is there? -- Ludovic Brenta.