From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bb14f1c1986544fb X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does Ada need a 'secure coding standard' as well? Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:03:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ei3husms.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <56847815-8d29-4bd9-831c-28f1fdb95907@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ruchba.enyo.de 1306702987 4075 172.17.135.6 (29 May 2011 21:03:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de Cancel-Lock: sha1:FU/1hBvLmsno9HYl+W7ddsvjhtk= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19577 Date: 2011-05-29T23:03:07+02:00 List-Id: * Maciej Sobczak: > On 28 Maj, 20:53, "Nasser M. Abbasi" wrote: > >> Or if it is even needed as much for Ada? > > Apparently it is, as several such documents were written for Ada. > > Apart from those already mentionend, these two might be of interest: > > "Ada95 Trustworthiness Study: Guidance on the Use of Ada95 in the > Development of High Integrity Systems" I don't think the CERT guide is targeted at high-integrity systems. It's intended for an extremely broad range of things, from server software to productivity applications for end users. This means that certain features are taken for granted, such as the need to restart applications from time to time (because of a non-compacting dynamic memory manager) and the ability of software to scale with available resources.