From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: organizing packages Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:35:42 +0200 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: <87egupc875.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.57.161.248.mobile.3.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1412361345 9673 109.57.161.248 (3 Oct 2014 18:35:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dJpE/0fygRZO97UnZlyrH6tM5B4= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22048 Date: 2014-10-03T20:35:42+02:00 List-Id: Stribor40 writes: > I was wondering if there is neater way to organize packages... You could always group some packages as a library, but how to do it depends on your compiler. In general, the easiest is to collect all the compilation units required for a project in one directory. At least three of the Ada compilers I know of will then be able to figure out what to recompile when automagically. Greetings, Jacob -- There only exist 10 kinds of people: Those who know binary numbers and those who don't know binary numbers.