From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else... Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:31:05 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87egk2ybvq.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> References: <877fq9uj6g.fsf@theworld.com> <65061686-5c8f-433b-9b11-9e228298158e@googlegroups.com> <87k2u96jms.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <06f8a6f9-d219-4d40-b9ac-8518e93839bd@googlegroups.com> <87y4io63jy.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <7a29d3e9-d1bd-4f4a-b1a6-14d3e1a83a4d@googlegroups.com> <87mvz36fen.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <2215b44f-8a89-47c6-a4c4-52b74d2dac45@googlegroups.com> <9e492c82-868d-43d3-a18a-38274400e337@googlegroups.com> <40184feb-4053-4ac3-8eaa-c3bd9cd8a77c@googlegroups.com> <10272577-945f-4682-85bc-8ad47f3653ae@googlegroups.com> <4ae21218-2148-434b-8acc-162f1cce594f@googlegroups.com> <874ml0yv84.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <87wpxvyhle.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d4217d68945dedf510265c644f2a7daa"; logging-data="9950"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eDXBmoPb7yLs0Ev9fW1tN" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/Tvsyo3U//IeM6R5SlHcPozNXck= sha1:tAqY97waMtYoTLlxSJ744iDQeQo= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26906 Date: 2015-07-20T10:31:05-07:00 List-Id: Tero Koskinen writes: > However, there are multiple Ada 2005 compilers. > Irvine ICCAda supports Ada 2005, ApexAda and ObjectAda from PTC(Atego) > support Ada 2005, Janus/Ada supports one or two Ada 2005 features. > Also, I think RRSoftware (Janus/Ada) got some of their features to Ada > 2005&2012. ... Thanks. I now wonder if Ada 2012 has gotten much uptake from the traditional big users. I would have thought so since it's a real improvement over older versions, but I understand how critical-systems users might be more technologically conservative than internet startups for example. Maybe they're all still using Ada 2005 or Ada 95 and plan to stay with it.