From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [ANN] GCC 14.2.0-3 (aarch64, macOS) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:21:30 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Message-ID: <87ed2tsplx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <0001HW.2CEF898E0005B91A30DDA538F@news.individual.net> <20241122110223.5f66f440@tag.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> <20241129200853.20e628f8@tag.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:21:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f64fae3639db49189bd8f4bb24b9887f"; logging-data="1300414"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195BKDLyc8W+b/Y5DnoPUSp" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2APdNUv/766vNAb7GW9GqiduL0= sha1:VYhJ9oW0g9Req91u6fr8PxosGcI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66466 List-Id: Simon Wright writes: > Björn Persson writes: >> It happened today in GCC 14.2.1 (as packaged in Fedora 41), so no, not >> only in 14.2.0. > > There's no official FSF 14.2.1 release - it may just be like Alire, > which only handles 3 levels, so they call the first packaging of 14.2.0 > 14.2.1. If you say 'gcc -v' it'll probably say 14.2.0. > > Of course I could be completely wrong and Fedora have added lots of > value! I see some potential for confusion, since there almost certainly will be an official gcc 14.2.1 release in the near future. That official release will include code that's not included in what Fedora calls gcc 14.2.1. It's a point release, so I wouldn't expect substantial changes, but still, I think Fedora should use a different naming scheme. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */