From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bfb89d61cc46e4b3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chris Morgan Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best*. Date: 1998/11/18 Message-ID: <87d86lgn4i.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 413129359 Sender: cm@mihalis.ix.netcom.com References: <72ue3m$omt@romeo.logica.co.uk> Organization: Linux Hackers Unlimited X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Nov 18 7:09:44 AM CST 1998 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-18T07:09:44-06:00 List-Id: "Nobody" writes: > I have to work on a project soon using ada 83.I am planning to do a little > programming before I start to learn some of the language. > If I wanted to get a compiler what is the best and do I have to pay for a > license (which I will if necessary) etc. You can get a reasonable idea with GNAT using the -ada83 flag. It doesn't magically become an ada83 compiler but it knows all ther Ada95 consructs to disallow and the subtle differences wont be worth worrying about yet. -- Chris Morgan Home Web Server - http://mihalis.dyn.ml.org/index.html