From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9f560d8fc43ddc9e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Newbie question about Character range 'A' .. 'Z' Date: 2000/05/17 Message-ID: <87d7mldjk6.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 624842430 References: Mail-Copies-To: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 958594233 19971 192.168.1.2 (17 May 2000 20:10:33 GMT) Organization: Penguin on board User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Florian Weimer NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 20:10:33 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-17T20:10:33+00:00 List-Id: gressett@iglobal.net writes: > Is Gnat 3.12p being overly restrictive, or is the erratum wrong? The ARM says (3.5 and 4.4): | 2. range_constraint ::= range | | 3. range ::= | range_attribute_reference | | simple_expression .. simple_expression | 3. relation ::= | simple_expression [relational_operator simple_expression] | | simple_expression [] range | | simple_expression [] subtype_mark GNAT seems to be right.