From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ddb34e4ee5e28db0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-25 14:38:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: BIND Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 23:38:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87d65vhh65.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1082929107 18075 212.9.189.171 (25 Apr 2004 21:38:27 GMT) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LgAdjkKUudh97HHR+dGDTAJ3Ryw= Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7486 Date: 2004-04-25T23:38:26+02:00 List-Id: "Alexei Polkhanov" writes: > Some zones can grow up to several millions of records - how you going to > cope with that ? What about Incremental Zone transfer protocol ? If you go for the low hanging fruit and write an authoritative-only name server that can serve zones of medium size, it's not too difficult. However, getting all the details correct is another story, and a full resolver is much more difficult to write. -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.