From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5de3cdb361233cf6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Berkeley DB Ada bindings Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:27:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87d5ssh1ua.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <1113811001.214546.97010@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1113816429 17043 212.9.189.177 (18 Apr 2005 09:27:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:TTc0tP3z8nupHEj9qjbD2ZhM0W8= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10519 Date: 2005-04-18T11:27:09+02:00 List-Id: > does anybody knows/care/do about Berkeley DB bindings to the Ada > language? I've written one (for version 4.3). It's still a bit incomplete: it doesn't support sequences, user-defined comparison functions, queues, and a buch of other stuff. And it's undocumented, that's why I doubt it's ready for publication at this stage. 8-/