From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1400b61b3f80c1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Are there noticable differences in Ada acceptance by country? References: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:50:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87d4pr6413.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:y4LTGDRgFFspMbXOfnl86HQqQDM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Tele2 X-Trace: DXC=\_n^d8RRbRN[TY9S\JW0FB6`Y6aWje^YJcXJQd672e:^9CA[6FgHVaGi?H Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20475 Date: 2008-03-18T23:50:00+01:00 List-Id: Mike Silva writes: > Some comments about Ada in the UK made me wonder about this. Are > there countries where the programming and/or management culture > seems to be more accepting of Ada? Are there Ada "hotbeds" about in > the world? And if so, what accounts for the differences? Ada is like computers; it developed top-down. It was initially military (like the ENIAC for nuclear weapons research), then spread to the top end of civil applications (like the first civil mainframes in the largest banks, or supercomputers in the top research labs), and then down to more and more mundane applications. It touched the bottom when it became possible to write web applications in Ada :) Not many countries build jet airplanes, satellites, or nuclear power plants. These are the countries where you're likely to find the most Ada software engineers, because that's where Ada came from. Unfortunately, this elite language for software engineers competes against lesser languages trying to move up the ladder: C and its offspring for "hackers", visual or scripting languages for "dummies", and Lisp and company for "computer scientists". Why? Because very few people want to be software engineers and would rather be hackers, dummies or computer scientists. Why? Because being an elite software engineer is as difficult as building a deep space probe. -- Ludovic Brenta.