From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0fa6eae2c537e3d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.internetdienste.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT.Regpat problem.
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:17:21 +0100
Message-ID: <87d3lj7yny.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1103221429170.5412@WHIRLWIND>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ruchba.enyo.de 1300821441 8217 172.17.135.6 (22 Mar 2011 19:17:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qURX3iydnoo5IOHJB7N9NLFoQbc=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18381
Date: 2011-03-22T20:17:21+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Peter C. Chapin:

> So is this an issue with GNAT.Regpat?

There used to be a buffer overflow (yes, the same thing that plagues C
programs) in GNAT.Regpat.  Which GNAT version do you use?