From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2746dae4f161c04e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-25 06:42:50 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Understanding Booleans
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:06:09 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87bshqj3fi.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <20011121.053507.496987743.3460@web.de>
 <slrn9vmtc6.tb.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3BFBDF14.4B83708B@boeing.com> <3BFFFE86.7D76A365@adaworks.com>
 <usnb32p6k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EJfFHZiVZ6l5xAq8QhTDHdzz7f4=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16950
Date: 2001-11-25T16:06:09+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> writes:

>> If the first form is more readable to more people, and produces no
>> additional overhead in the excecutable, I think it is perfectly
>> acceptable.
>
> It is acceptable, but I find hard to beleive that the first version
> (= True) is more readable.

You can easily document both alternatives with separate comments if
you use the first version.