From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,17b924d1394824f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-09 14:33:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!uni-erlangen.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and Atmel AVR Microcontrollers
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 23:51:13 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87bsh89fdq.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <75k0v9.2k1.ln@320025674319.dialin.t-online.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fwPlYM9SnSuQ6xRwFskRQm5aY4Y=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17656
Date: 2001-12-09T23:51:13+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> writes:

> since gcc has support for the Atmel AVR series of microcontrollers and
> gcc 3.1 is supposed to have gnat included, does that mean that from
> gcc 3.1 on I will be able to programm AVRs in Ada with a plain vanilla
> gcc (if I build gcc from the sources configured as a cross compiler)? 

Most likely no, if there's no Ada run-time library for the Atmel AVR
and its OS (haven't checked this, though).