From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4fd2,23202754c9ce78dd X-Google-Attributes: gidf4fd2,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,15edb893ef79e231 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,15edb893ef79e231 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,15edb893ef79e231 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-12 00:43:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!freenix!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Friedrich Dominicus Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: True faiths ( was Re: The true faith ) Date: 12 Jan 2002 09:42:48 +0100 Organization: Q Software Solutions GmbH Message-ID: <87bsg03qpj.fsf@frown.here> References: <3c36fbc5_10@news.newsgroups.com> <4idg3u40ermnp682n6igc5gudp7hajkea9@4ax.com> <76be8851.0201101909.9db0718@posting.google.com> <9jtu3u8cq92b05j47uat3412tok6hqu1ki@4ax.com> <3C3FB4CA.14998012@nyc.rr.com> <0gjv3ucg1tb0guamnkcalt4sq1ki9plv2o@4ax.com> <3c44d1d6.179093031@nntp.interaccess.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1010824835 03 23701 3tqdTFyVSuaSz9 020112 08:40:35 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 320004655587-0001@t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:24098 comp.lang.ada:18818 comp.lang.eiffel:5370 comp.lang.smalltalk:17810 Date: 2002-01-12T09:42:48+01:00 List-Id: olczyk@interaccess.com (Thaddeus L Olczyk) writes: > n Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:49:59 +1100, israel r t > wrote: > > >On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 03:56:04 GMT, Kenny Tilton > >wrote: > > > >>Obviously the winner is any compiled (fast), GCed, GFing, MI dynamic > >>language with macros. Mature, an ANSII standard and a free > >>implementation would not hurt either. hang on... > > > >And Ocaml wins again ! :-) > > > >No macros though... Not fully correct see http://caml.inria.fr/camlp4/ > >Lots of currying and and higher order functions however. > > > >And speeeeeeed ! > >( As if it really matters with commodity 2 GHz processors... ) > Hmmm. Is there a version of ML that supports macros? Well I think it's Ocaml. Regards Friedrich