From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-20 11:08:36 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!cert.uni-stuttgart.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How Open Source software developers pay the bills, from within
 a successful such operation (was): Open Source: in conflict with the
 development process in the Ada community?
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:08:37 +0200
Organization: Enyo -- not your organization
Message-ID: <87bsce1bve.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <3CB94312.5040802@snafu.de>
 <zPlu8.90$2a2.158913722@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
 <4519e058.0204150645.62003096@posting.google.com>
 <3CBCEB15.E104D1F5@adaworks.com>
 <35c5c360dfe83cb34ea9648445bd0e95.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <a9jvhq$lbg$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <5ee5b646.0204190620.1902ede@posting.google.com>
 <fabfb33253b2dea9ae61e01e4a71de03.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <5ee5b646.0204200841.2365b39e@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deneb.enyo.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: cygnus.enyo.de 1019326119 7192 212.9.189.171 (20 Apr 2002 18:08:39
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@enyo.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Apr 2002 18:08:39 GMT
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ru8JYtsLKux/ky2/mVcVbNo2muA=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22825
Date: 2002-04-20T18:08:39+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message news:<fabfb33253b2dea9ae61e01e4a71de03.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>...
>
> One thing that is interesting here is that we are not really an
> Open Source developer. The idea of open source development is that
> development is a shared community activity, and that all sorts of
> people contribute to the development.

According to Eric S. Raymond, "Open Source" does not necessarily imply
the Bazaar model, the Cathedral model (which was once common to many
GNU projects---Emacs, for example, joined the Bazaar only rather
recently) is still considered "Open Source".